Science is not fun

Opinions personals de membres del CEHIC i alumnes de postgrau

Arxiu per març, 2011

març 19 2011

Los públicos de la ciencia

Publicat a General |

Si volue veure la meva conferència de presentació del llibre a l’IEC, aneu a:

http://videoteca.iec.cat/entrada.asp?v_id=115


No hi ha comentaris

març 19 2011

La revista Mètode m’ha fet una entrevista

Publicat a General |

Per si us interessa llegir-la i criticar-la, aneu a:

http://www.metode.cat/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1655


No hi ha comentaris

març 17 2011

A crisis of science journalism?

Publicat a General |

Aquest és el títol del seminari que Andy Williams, de la Universitat de Cardiff, pronunciarà a la London School of Economics la setmana que ve. La seva recerca sobre l’economia política del periodisme científic al Regne Unit, i sobre els canvis propiciats per les retallades pressupostàries i la subcontractació de notícies científiques, pot tenir interès per als lectors del bloc:

“Science news is not formed in a social, economic, or cultural vacuum. It is written by people at news organisations which are cutting staff and investing fewer resources into news production than previously. I believe that any discussion of science news in the UK must be situated in the context of the economic and political conditions under which news is made. Drawing on the findings of an internet survey of UK science news journalists (response rate 43%), and 52 semi-structured interviews with specialist journalists and editors, this paper will investigate elements of the political economy of UK specialist science, health and environment news journalism by assessing changes in the strength of this news beat over time, and evaluating changes in working practices and working conditions.

“The research shows there was a significant long-term expansion in the staffing of the UK national science news beat in the 1990s, but also that this growth has recently tailed off as key news outlets have started to cut science journalists. Furthermore, workloads have risen significantly in recent years and this has fuelled a number of problems resulting in increased story counts, pressures to produce more online content, and less time to find, check, and research stories. Consequently, important elements of journalism practice are increasingly outsourced to a fairly narrow range of efficient science news sources. This leads to an increasing reliance on PR information subsidies and a homogenisation of science news content. As long as science reporters’ everyday routines leave ever-diminished time and space for finding their own news stories and writing them rigorously, the prospects for high quality, independent, science news in national mainstream media are diminished.”

A partir d’un missatge a la llista de distribució de correu electrònic Mersenne.


No hi ha comentaris

març 01 2011

Is there a “good” and a “bad” way of popularizing science?

Publicat a General |

Yesterday I gave a talk about my Atapuerca project at the CSIC in Barcelona. In the ensuing discussion I was asked what I think about the gigantic popularization industry of Atapuerca? In particular scientists wonder where is the line between “popularization” and “propaganda”? Have Arsuaga and his colleagues gone too far? Did they cross a line? I responded that it is not up to me as a historian of science to decide this. It is not my task to make up norms for what is good popularization and what is bad popularization. I think a historian of science should reconstruct the narratives of the popular discourse, show how researchers construct a scientific persona, point at the (often hidden) political and ideological agendas (in short: all the different uses of popularization) yet without judging it. That would simply be ahistorical.


No hi ha comentaris